Bayesian vs frequentist: comparing Bayesian model selection with a frequentist approach using the iterative smoothing method

نویسندگان

چکیده

We have developed a frequentist approach for model selection which determines the consistency between any cosmological and data using distribution of likelihoods from iterative smoothing method. Using this approach, we shown how confidently can conclude whether support given without comparison to different one. In current work, compare our with conventional Bayesian based on estimation evidence nested sampling. use simulated future Roman (formerly WFIRST)-like type Ia supernovae in analysis. discuss limits show proposed perform better falsification individual models. Namely, if true is among candidates being tested that select correct model. If all options are false, then will merely least incorrect Our designed such case models false.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Model Selection: Beyond the Bayesian/Frequentist Divide

The principle of parsimony also known as “Ockham’s razor” has inspired many theories of model selection. Yet such theories, all making arguments in favor of parsimony, are based on very different premises and have developed distinct methodologies to derive algorithms. We have organized challenges and edited a special issue of JMLR and several conference proceedings around the theme of model sel...

متن کامل

The False Dilemma: Bayesian vs. Frequentist

There are two main opposing schools of statistical reasoning, frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Until recent days, the frequentist or classical approach has dominated the scientific research, but Bayesianism has reappeared with a strong impulse that is starting to change the situation. Recently the controversy about the primacy of one of the two approaches seems to be unfinished at a philoso...

متن کامل

The False Dilemma: Bayesian vs. Frequentist ∗1

There are two main opposing schools of statistical reasoning, Frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Until recent days, the frequentist or classical approach has dominated the scientific research, but Bayesianism has reappeared with a strong impulse that is starting to change the situation. Recently the controversy about the primacy of one of the two approaches seems to be unfinished at a philoso...

متن کامل

Bayesian and frequentist approaches

Though the Bayesian vs. frequentist debate is largely muted in the statistics community, it continues among those applying advanced statistical methods in the physical sciences. The debate often misses some salient features on both sides, relying on simplistic arguments based on some single aspect of the methodology such as p-values or priors. The discussion here argues that each approach has s...

متن کامل

Bayesian Frequentist Multiple Testing

We introduce a Bayesian approach to multiple testing. The method is an extension of the false discovery rate (FDR) method due to Benjamini and Hochberg (1995). We also examine the empirical Bayes approach to simultaneous inference proposed by Efron, Tibshirani, Storey and Tusher (2001). We show that, in contrast to the single hypothesis case – where Bayes and frequentist tests do not agree even...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1475-7516', '1475-7508']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/03/047